Skip to content

Collapse

brad conover

From the response it appears that protected bike lanes (other than the Inwood connector) may not be
From the response it appears that protected bike lanes (other than the
Inwood connector) may not be on the group's agenda, at least for now, which
is fine, as we all agree that "traffic calming" is a good idea, so I fully
support your efforts.           

     


Bradford D. Conover
Conover Law Offices 
75 Rockefeller Plaza, 20th Floor 
New York, New York 10019 
(212) 588-9080 (tel) 
(212) 763-5001 (fax) 
brad@... 
  
Disclaimer: Please note that this email does not constitute legal advice nor
does it create an attorney-client relationship until our firm undertakes a
formal engagement in writing. 

This message may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
If you are not the stated recipient, please notify the sender immediately,
via reply email or telephone and destroy all copies of the email message.
Unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. Thank
you. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Rabinowitz [mailto:jonathan.rabinowitz@...] 
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 3:06 PM
To: inwood-livable-streets-discussion@...
Subject: Re: [Inwood Livable Streets discussion] Robt Jackson will meetwith
us

I would prefer to get the CM's help to build a significant public
constituency in order to /create/ a significant /negative/ impact on traffic
in our neighborhood than to ask him for help with a project that has such
specific aims. I'd rather not to ride in a 3' wide chute all the way down
Broadway; the 3' wide lane on 6th Avenue from Greenwich Ave to 42nd street
is awful narrow.

Jonathan


On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Bradford D. Conover <brad@...>
wrote:
> On Broadway where there is a center median, I would not think a narrow 3
ft'
> bike lane going each way would add much to the existing congestion. 
> How much might come out of the median and what impact it would have on 
> traffic would, of course, need to be studied. On St Nich, as there are 
> already bike lanes, the lanes could be moved to the inside, rather 
> than outside, of parked cars without a significant impact on traffic, 
> such as the protected lanes downtown.
>
> Bradford D. Conover
> Conover Law Offices
> 75 Rockefeller Plaza, 20th Floor
> New York, New York 10019
> (212) 588-9080 (tel)
> (212) 763-5001 (fax)
> brad@...

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Rabinowitz [mailto:jonathan.rabinowitz@...]
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:18 PM
> To: inwood-livable-streets-discussion@...
> Subject: Re: [Inwood Livable Streets discussion] Robt Jackson will 
> meetwith us
>
> St Nick goes up to 193rd St, and then it meets Ft. George Hill, which 
> connects with Nagle Avenue and Dyckman in Inwood. It has no center 
> median, however, and it isn't part of Jackson's district north of 158th
St.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Marjorie J. Clarke, Ph.D.
> <mclarke@...> wrote:
>> St. Nick is already a bike lane south of the hospital.  How far north 
>> does St. Nick even go?
>>
>> At 01:50 PM 1/14/2010, you wrote:
>>
>> Based on traffic congestion, Broadway would be a poor option - St.
>> Nicholas is pretty clear, and Amsterdam would be a possibility, 
>> though going all the way east, one might as well use the Harlem River
path.
>>
>> R
>>
>> RoughAcres/RL McKee
>> 447 Fort Washington Avenue, Suite 63
>> New York, NY 10033
>> M: 917.526.0050 • E: rlmckee@...
>> W: http://www.roughacres.us
>> __________________________________
>> Principal, RLM Marketing & Advertising Member, Community Board 12
>> (Manhattan) - ON STRIKE:
>> http://tinyurl.com/yg3rxvk
>> Member, Northern Manhattan Photo Group; Sustainable Streets 
>> Initiative; Transportation Alternatives; DINAction; RINGarden; 
>> Artists United
>>
>> "The most sacred of the duties of a government [is] to do equal and 
>> impartial justice to all its citizens." - Thomas Jefferson
>>
>> "When I walk through those [Senate Chamber] doors, I leave my Bible 
>> outside." – NY State Senator Eric Adams, voting "Aye" on marriage 
>> equality 12/2/09.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2010, at 1:33 PM, Bradford D. Conover wrote:
>>
>> That is something to discuss.  I would think, ideally, if feasible, 
>> it should be same avenue running the entire length of Manhattan.  I 
>> do not think CB7 has progressed enough so that we know what avenue 
>> will end up with protected bike lanes to our south in CB7. We could 
>> reach out to them for an update. That would need to connect through 
>> Harlem as well. I believe Broadway center isle was part of the upper 
>> westside
> groups "Blueprint"
>> proposal.
>>
>> Based on my own observations in WH, I would think Broadway (on both 
>> side of center isle) and Amsterdam (already has painted lanes both
>> ways) would both be candidates. However, I have not studied or lived 
>> in area long enough to know best option. Right now, it is the Concept 
>> that I am pushing. The proposed CB12 workshop would explore concrete 
>> alternatives for location and type of protected lanes as well as 
>> other traffic calming measures. And if the community was behind it, 
>> ultimately it would be DOT that would probably dictate which avenue 
>> and what type of protected lane. The Hudson Greenway is great, but 
>> pushing the only protected bike lane to the outer edges of the city 
>> is not really incorporating biking within the city as a viable means 
>> of
> commuting.
>>
>> Same for rapid bus service, I think the concept is important to drum 
>> up support for and which avenue might best accommodate a rapid bus is 
>> something to be explored.
>>
>>
>> Bradford D. Conover
>> Conover Law Offices
>> 75 Rockefeller Plaza, 20th Floor
>> New York, New York 10019
>> (212) 588-9080 (tel)
>> (212) 763-5001 (fax)
>> brad@...
>>
>> Disclaimer: Please note that this email does not constitute legal 
>> advice nor does it create an attorney-client relationship until our 
>> firm undertakes a formal engagement in writing.
>>
>> This message may contain information that is privileged and/or
> confidential.
>> If you are not the stated recipient, please notify the sender 
>> immediately, via reply email or telephone and destroy all copies of 
>> the
> email message.
>> Unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Marjorie J. Clarke, Ph.D. [ mailto:mclarke@...]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 12:59 PM
>> To: inwood-livable-streets-discussion@...
>> Subject: RE: [Inwood Livable Streets discussion] Robt Jackson will 
>> meetwith us
>>
>> What I mean is, which north south corridor, what arrangement on the 
>> street, and which corridor for rapid transit.
>>
>> At 12:43 PM 1/14/2010, you wrote:
>>
>> I am suggesting that we get CB12, and the local politicians, 
>> including Jackson, to support the same kind of motions that both CB 7 
>> and CB 8 passed recently asking DOT to study the feasibility of a 
>> protected bike lane on a N/S ave. (CB8 also asked that the bike lanes 
>> be incorporated in rapid bus transit plans for 1st and 2nd ave.).
>> I have raised this with CB12 Trans comm and reported on it in other
> emails.
>>
>>
>> Bradford D. Conover
>> Conover Law Offices
>> 75 Rockefeller Plaza, 20th Floor
>> New York, New York 10019
>> (212) 588-9080 (tel)
>> (212) 763-5001 (fax)
>> brad@...
>>
>> Disclaimer: Please note that this email does not constitute legal 
>> advice nor does it create an attorney-client relationship until our 
>> firm undertakes a formal engagement in writing.
>>
>> This message may contain information that is privileged and/or
> confidential.
>> If you are not the stated recipient, please notify the sender 
>> immediately, via reply email or telephone and destroy all copies of 
>> the
> email message.
>> Unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Marjorie J. Clarke, Ph.D. [ mailto:mclarke@...]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 12:05 PM
>> To: inwood-livable-streets-discussion@...
>> Subject: RE: [Inwood Livable Streets discussion] Robt Jackson will 
>> meetwith us
>>
>>
>> Can you be more specific about what you're asking for?
>>
>> At 11:19 AM 1/14/2010, Bradford D. Conover wrote:
>>
>> There is a section in Dist 7 that covers Broadway, so I would think 
>> Jackson's support would be necessary eventually, particularly if the 
>> upper Westside proposal to DOT ultimately selects Broadway as the 
>> location for the protected lane. I am not sure it needs to be 
>> specific at this stage, just find out where he stands on the issue, 
>> and if he opposes, why?  The idea is to plant and reinforce the seed, 
>> that this is the direction many CBs in NYC are headed and that a bike 
>> lane to be effective needs to be a complete network.  If DOT moves 
>> forward with such improvements enhancing the livability (and market 
>> value) of other neighborhoods, CB12 should not be left out. I also 
>> think an express bus running n/s in a protected lane on Westside is 
>> an idea which should be encouraged, particularly in view of DOT's 
>> planned one year shut down of the no 1 subway for major repairs. The 
>> issue of bus congestion at the end of the line, is a related, but
separate issue.
>>
>>
>> Bradford D. Conover
>> Conover Law Offices
>> 75 Rockefeller Plaza, 20th Floor
>> New York, New York 10019
>> (212) 588-9080 (tel)
>> (212) 763-5001 (fax)
>> brad@...
>>
>> Disclaimer: Please note that this email does not constitute legal 
>> advice nor does it create an attorney-client relationship until our 
>> firm undertakes a formal engagement in writing.
>>
>> This message may contain information that is privileged and/or
> confidential.
>> If you are not the stated recipient, please notify the sender 
>> immediately, via reply email or telephone and destroy all copies of 
>> the
> email message.
>> Unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jonathan Rabinowitz [ mailto:jonathan.rabinowitz@...]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 10:34 AM
>> To: inwood-livable-streets-discussion@...
>> Subject: Re: [Inwood Livable Streets discussion] Robt Jackson will 
>> meetwith us
>>
>> Brad, look at Jackson's district at this site:
>> http://gis.nyc.gov/doitt/nycitymap/
>>
>> Use the "show additional data on map" feature to see the city council 
>> districts. The seventh (Jackson's) district's EASTERN boundary 
>> between 178th St and 170th St is Haven Ave. It's a shame, but Jackson 
>> will likely just punt to Ydanis on your proposal as it covers 
>> Washington
> Heights.
>>
>> District 7 does cover Broadway between 159th and 125th however
>>
>> Rita, do you have a bicycle educator in mind?
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Bradford D. Conover 
>> <brad@...>
>> wrote:
>>> Unless I am misreading them, except for crosswalk, the proposals 
>>> relate mostly to Inwood.  How about his participation/support and/or 
>>> hosting of the traffic calming workshop in spring with CB12 to 
>>> consider asking DOT to study/construct a protected bike lane on an 
>>> avenue running N/S to connect WH/Inwood to proposed bike lane on
>> avenues on upper west side?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Marjorie J. Clarke, Ph.D. [ mailto:mclarke@...]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:36 PM
>>> To: inwood-livable-streets-discussion@...
>>> Subject: Re: [Inwood Livable Streets discussion] Robt Jackson will 
>>> meetwith us
>>>
>>> Looks like a good list.  Let's get a little more specific on some.
>>> What repairs on the Greenway?  What exactly are we asking him to do 
>>> about the summertime auto rallies?  Also, I think we want a couple 
>>> of speed bumps on Dyckman west of Henshaw.
>>>
>>> At 11:13 AM 1/13/2010, you wrote:
>>>
>>> So there we go!
>>>
>>> 1. Build a separated bike lane along RSD between Dyckman St (RING
>>> Garden) and the N-bound onramp to the highway as part of the DGC;
>>>
>>> 2. Fix the perennial crummy condition of pavement on Broadway with 
>>> concrete;
>>>
>>> 3. Ensure access to the Henry Hudson Bridge bike path;
>>>
>>> 4. End the summertime auto rallies on Dyckman St near the Marina;
>>>
>>> 5. Repair the Greenway between West 181st St and Dyckman St;
>>>
>>> 6. Add a crosswalk on Bennett St. at the IND 190th St Station.
>>>
>>> Anything else?
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Marjorie J. Clarke, Ph.D.
>>> <mclarke@... > wrote:
>>>> The only hitch is that Jackson's district is northeast of Broadway 
>>>> and doesn't cover Dyckman between Broadway and Nagle. Ydanis 
>>>> Rodriguez has the rest. IIRC, the Greenway connector should go 
>>>> along RSD between the RING Garden and the Greenway, yes?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Riverside Drive is often forgotten, but it is a speedway and 
>>>> part of the proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Things on Jackson's side of the neighborhood include the Bx12 
>>>> idling on Isham St,
>>>>
>>>> I thought that was east of Broadway.
>>>>
>>>> the auto rallies held on Dyckman near the marina, access to the 
>>>> Henry Hudson Bridge bike path, the crummy condition of the Greenway 
>>>> between West 181st and Dyckman, and the lack of a crosswalk on 
>>>> Bennett St at the 190th St IND station.
>>>>
>>>> yes and the crummy condition of Broadway.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Aaron Wolfe 
>>>> <aaronewolfe@...
>>>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Let's make sure he knows about all of our goals, but I think we 
>>>>> should focus on the Dyckman connector because of the momentum that 
>>>>> project seems to be gaining.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aaron
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Jonathan Rabinowitz < 
>>>>> jonathan.rabinowitz@...> wrote:
>>>>>> Dr. Clarke,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would have responded earlier were I living in Jackson's district.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suggest meeting him in February. That gives us an entire month 
>>>>>> to get the word out, and we can set the agenda at the January 
>>>>>> meeting (Tuesday 19th, at the yoga studio).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Marjorie J. Clarke, Ph.D.
>>>>>> <mclarke@... > wrote:
>>>>>>> Good question.  I'm stymied at the lack of response (other than
>> yours).
>>>>>>> My first thought is to have our meeting start 45 minutes before 
>>>>>>> we tell him to show up, but we also need to have a decent showing.
>>>>>>> How do we do this other than make phone calls.  But we don't 
>>>>>>> have phone numbers.  We need to get this!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At 07:52 PM 1/10/2010, you wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK, when?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Marjorie J. Clarke, Ph.D.
>>>>>>> <mclarke@... > wrote:
>>>>>>> A quick note on my way out (again).  Ran into Robert Jackson at 
>>>>>>> RING this morning (our electronics recycling day, which he
>>>>>>> sponsored) and I said we want to meet with him, do we need an 
>>>>>>> appt on a Friday.  He said he'd come to meet us wherever we meet.
>>>>>>> Let's set up a time.  So we need to get our "asks" in a row and 
>>>>>>> get this going!


--
Archive:
http://www.livablestreets.com/projects/inwood-livable-streets/lists/inwood-l
ivable-streets-discussion/archive/2010/01/1263499612417
To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to
inwood-livable-streets-discussion@....  Please contact
inwood-livable-streets-discussion-manager@... for
questions.

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4772 (20100114) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


 

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4772 (20100114) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com
 
 

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4772 (20100114) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com