<mclarke@...> wrote:
> What I mean is, which north south corridor, what arrangement on the street,
> and which corridor for rapid transit.
>
> At 12:43 PM 1/14/2010, you wrote:
>
> I am suggesting that we get CB12, and the local politicians, including
> Jackson, to support the same kind of motions that both CB 7 and CB 8 passed
> recently asking DOT to study the feasibility of a protected bike lane on a
> N/S ave. (CB8 also asked that the bike lanes be incorporated in rapid bus
> transit plans for 1st and 2nd ave.).
> I have raised this with CB12 Trans comm and reported on it in other emails.
>
>
> Bradford D. Conover
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Marjorie J. Clarke, Ph.D. [ mailto:mclarke@...]
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 12:05 PM
> To: inwood-livable-streets-discussion@...
> Subject: RE: [Inwood Livable Streets discussion] Robt Jackson will meetwith
> us
>
>
> Can you be more specific about what you're asking for?
>
> At 11:19 AM 1/14/2010, Bradford D. Conover wrote:
>
> There is a section in Dist 7 that covers Broadway, so I would think
> Jackson's support would be necessary eventually, particularly if the upper
> Westside proposal to DOT ultimately selects Broadway as the location for the
> protected lane. I am not sure it needs to be specific at this stage, just
> find out where he stands on the issue, and if he opposes, why? The idea is
> to plant and reinforce the seed, that this is the direction many CBs in NYC
> are headed and that a bike lane to be effective needs to be a complete
> network. If DOT moves forward with such improvements enhancing the
> livability (and market value) of other neighborhoods, CB12 should not be
> left out. I also think an express bus running n/s in a protected lane on
> Westside is an idea which should be encouraged, particularly in view of
> DOT's planned one year shut down of the no 1 subway for major repairs. The
> issue of bus congestion at the end of the line, is a related, but separate
> issue.
>
>
> Bradford D. Conover
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Rabinowitz [ mailto:jonathan.rabinowitz@...]
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 10:34 AM
> To: inwood-livable-streets-discussion@...
> Subject: Re: [Inwood Livable Streets discussion] Robt Jackson will meetwith
> us
>
> Brad, look at Jackson's district at this site:
> http://gis.nyc.gov/doitt/nycitymap/
>
> Use the "show additional data on map" feature to see the city council
> districts. The seventh (Jackson's) district's EASTERN boundary between 178th
> St and 170th St is Haven Ave. It's a shame, but Jackson will likely just
> punt to Ydanis on your proposal as it covers Washington Heights.
>
> District 7 does cover Broadway between 159th and 125th however
>
> Rita, do you have a bicycle educator in mind?
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Bradford D. Conover <brad@...>
> wrote:
>> Unless I am misreading them, except for crosswalk, the proposals
>> relate mostly to Inwood. How about his participation/support and/or
>> hosting of the traffic calming workshop in spring with CB12 to
>> consider asking DOT to study/construct a protected bike lane on an
>> avenue running N/S to connect WH/Inwood to proposed bike lane on
> avenues on upper west side?
>>
>>
>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Marjorie J. Clarke, Ph.D. [ mailto:mclarke@...]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:36 PM
>> To: inwood-livable-streets-discussion@...
>> Subject: Re: [Inwood Livable Streets discussion] Robt Jackson will
>> meetwith us
>>
>> Looks like a good list. Let's get a little more specific on some.
>> What repairs on the Greenway? What exactly are we asking him to do
>> about the summertime auto rallies? Also, I think we want a couple of
>> speed bumps on Dyckman west of Henshaw.
>>
>> At 11:13 AM 1/13/2010, you wrote:
>>
>> So there we go!
>>
>> 1. Build a separated bike lane along RSD between Dyckman St (RING
>> Garden) and the N-bound onramp to the highway as part of the DGC;
>>
>> 2. Fix the perennial crummy condition of pavement on Broadway with
>> concrete;
>>
>> 3. Ensure access to the Henry Hudson Bridge bike path;
>>
>> 4. End the summertime auto rallies on Dyckman St near the Marina;
>>
>> 5. Repair the Greenway between West 181st St and Dyckman St;
>>
>> 6. Add a crosswalk on Bennett St. at the IND 190th St Station.
>>
>> Anything else?
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Marjorie J. Clarke, Ph.D.
>> <mclarke@...> wrote:
>>> The only hitch is that Jackson's district is northeast of Broadway
>>> and doesn't cover Dyckman between Broadway and Nagle. Ydanis
>>> Rodriguez has the rest. IIRC, the Greenway connector should go along
>>> RSD between the RING Garden and the Greenway, yes?
>>>
>>> Yes, Riverside Drive is often forgotten, but it is a speedway and
>>> part of the proposal.
>>>
>>> Things on Jackson's side of the neighborhood include the Bx12 idling
>>> on Isham St,
>>>
>>> I thought that was east of Broadway.
>>>
>>> the auto rallies held on Dyckman near the marina, access to the Henry
>>> Hudson Bridge bike path, the crummy condition of the Greenway between
>>> West 181st and Dyckman, and the lack of a crosswalk on Bennett St at
>>> the 190th St IND station.
>>>
>>> yes and the crummy condition of Broadway.
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Aaron Wolfe <aaronewolfe@...>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Let's make sure he knows about all of our goals, but I think we
>>>> should focus on the Dyckman connector because of the momentum that
>>>> project seems to be gaining.
>>>>
>>>> Aaron
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Jonathan Rabinowitz
>>>> <jonathan.rabinowitz@...> wrote:
>>>>> Dr. Clarke,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would have responded earlier were I living in Jackson's district.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest meeting him in February. That gives us an entire month to
>>>>> get the word out, and we can set the agenda at the January meeting
>>>>> (Tuesday 19th, at the yoga studio).
>>>>>
>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Marjorie J. Clarke, Ph.D.
>>>>> <mclarke@...> wrote:
>>>>>> Good question. I'm stymied at the lack of response (other than
> yours).
>>>>>> My first thought is to have our meeting start 45 minutes before we
>>>>>> tell him to show up, but we also need to have a decent showing.
>>>>>> How do we do this other than make phone calls. But we don't have
>>>>>> phone numbers. We need to get this!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At 07:52 PM 1/10/2010, you wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, when?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Marjorie J. Clarke, Ph.D.
>>>>>> <mclarke@... > wrote:
>>>>>> A quick note on my way out (again). Ran into Robert Jackson at
>>>>>> RING this morning (our electronics recycling day, which he
>>>>>> sponsored) and I said we want to meet with him, do we need an appt
>>>>>> on a Friday. He said he'd come to meet us wherever we meet.
>>>>>> Let's set up a time. So we need to get our "asks" in a row and
>>>>>> get this going!
>
>